How does Adam Ringham address the effectiveness of flu shots in his content?

Adam highlights research suggesting that flu shots can be far less beneficial—and sometimes even harmful—compared to how they are promoted.

In one piece of content, he references a Cleveland Clinic study of over 53,000 employees during the 2024–25 season, noting a negative vaccine effectiveness of -26.9%. He emphasizes that vaccinated individuals in that study had a higher risk of influenza than the unvaccinated, and questions why such shots are still aggressively promoted.

In another post, he contrasts this with the commonly cited 10–20% effectiveness for flu shots, implying that potential negative effects or poor performance “offset” that modest benefit and reinforcing his broader message about informed consent and skepticism of blanket vaccination campaigns.

Is there a specific post or angle on flu shot effectiveness you want to dig into more?